By Neta C. Crawford
The accidental deaths of civilians in struggle are too usually brushed aside as unavoidable, inevitable, and unintentional. And regardless of the simplest efforts of the U.S. to prevent them, civilian casualties in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan were a standard characteristic of the us' wars after Sep 11. In responsibility for Killing, Neta C. Crawford makes a speciality of the factors of those many episodes of foreseeable collateral harm and Read more...
summary: The unintentional deaths of civilians in struggle are too frequently pushed aside as unavoidable, inevitable, and unintended. And regardless of the simplest efforts of the U.S. to prevent them, civilian casualties in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan were a typical function of the U.S.' wars after Sept. 11. In responsibility for Killing, Neta C. Crawford makes a speciality of the motives of those many episodes of foreseeable collateral harm and the ethical accountability for them. The dominant paradigm of felony and ethical accountability in battle at the present time stresses either purpose and person responsibility. planned killing of civilians is outlawed and foreign legislation blames person squaddies and commanders for such killing. a person soldier could be sentenced existence in felony or loss of life for intentionally killing even a small variety of civilians, however the huge scale killing of dozens or maybe 1000s of civilians might be forgiven if it was once unintentional--"incidental"--To an army operation. The very legislation that protects noncombatants from planned killing might permit many episodes of unintentional killing. less than foreign legislations, civilian killing could be forgiven if it was once accidental and incidental to a militarily useful operation. Given the character of latest battle, the place army organizations-training, and the alternative of guns, doctrine, and tactics-create the stipulations for systemic collateral harm, Crawford contends that putting ethical accountability for systemic collateral harm on contributors is lost. She develops a brand new conception of organizational ethical supplier and accountability, and exhibits how the U.S. army exercised ethical service provider and ethical accountability to minimize the prevalence of collateral harm in America's most modern wars. certainly, while the U.S. army and its allies observed that the belief of collateral harm killing used to be inflicting it to lose help within the conflict zones, it moved to a "population centric" doctrine, placing civilian defense on the center of its strategy.--Publisher description
Read Online or Download Accountability for killing : moral responsibility for collateral damage in America's post-9/11 wars PDF
Best security books
La sécurité dans la maison (L'artisan de sa maison)
Assurer l. a. sécurité de son habitation est à los angeles portée de tous mais, grâce à ce petit livre pratique, on ne se laissera plus décourager par l. a. variété ou los angeles complexité des matériels disponibles. Qu'il s'agisse de remplacer une serrure ou d'installer un système de vidéosurveillance on saura quoi faire et remark.
This publication constitutes the refereed lawsuits of the overseas Symposium on safeguard in Computing and Communications, SSCC 2013, held in Mysore, India, in August 2013. The 24 revised complete papers awarded including 15 poster papers have been rigorously reviewed and chosen from 111 submissions. The papers conceal all points of safe computing and verbal exchange in networking and dispensed structures akin to cloud-based information facilities.
- Transactions on Data Hiding and Multimedia Security VII (Lecture Notes in Computer Science)
- Naval Peacekeeping and Humanitarian Operations: Stability from the Sea (Cass Series: Naval Policy and History)
- Advances in Information Security Management & Small Systems Security
- Autonomous and Semiautonomous Weapons Systems
- Somalia: State Collapse, Terrorism and Piracy
- Wireshark Network Security
Additional resources for Accountability for killing : moral responsibility for collateral damage in America's post-9/11 wars
Example text
What are the causes of these incidents? Are they isolated events, attributable to a few “bad apples” or combat stress? Does US military training and the counterinsurgency mission tend to produce these atrocities? ” I show that the theory of individual moral responsibility for atrocity and war crimes should, at a minimum, be questioned in light of the fact that individual moral agency is constrained in war. Or, as Dick Couch, a former Navy SEAL and instructor at the US Naval Academy, argues: “We must consider the system as well as individuals.
But I also heard concern from members of the military, expressed by Majors, Lt. Colonels, and Colonels that the United States was not doing enough to protect civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq. These concerns were eventually echoed publicly by higher ranking officers such as this US Brigadier General speaking from Afghanistan: “I mean, we are so focused on the population and we are very attuned to civilian casualties. php. Donald H. S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, DoD News Briefing— Secretary Rumsfeld and Gen.
A few hours after the incident a reporter asked Admiral John Stufflebeem to explain how troops 100 meters away from the strike could have been hurt: “That’s a long way away. ” Stufflebeem replied, “A 2,000-pound weapon is a devastating weapon. . ”61 But in combat, the 60 These distances are, respectively, for 10 percent and a 1 percent probability of incapacitation. S. 58–59. 61 Stufflebeem, “DoD News Briefing—ASD PA Clarke and Rear Adm. Stufflebeem,” http://www. transcriptid=2600, 5 December 2001.